IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRWP-9939-2025 Date of Decision : 11.09.2025 JASKARAN SINGH AND ANOTHER …. PETITIONERS V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .…RESPONDENTS CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present : Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J . (Oral) 1. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of direction to respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to take an appropriate action against respondents Nos.4 to 8 who are harassing and threatening the petitioners by interfering in their peaceful life and liberty. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners are major and are residing together in a live-in relationship, but they apprehend threat to their life and liberty from the private respondents. While drawing the attention of this Court to representation dated 09.09.2025 (Annexure P-5), learned counsel has submitted that the matter was reported to respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga seeking police protection, however, it went in vain. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into the aforesaid representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts PRIYANKA 2025.09.17 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9939-2025 -2- notice on behalf of the official respondents and submitted that the competent authority will take action in accordance with law. 5. Heard. 6. In view of the above, without commenting upon the status of live-in- relationship of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2 to take necessary steps, as per direction of this Court as held in CRWP No. 4660 of 2021 titled as “Yash Pal and another vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 09.09.2024 the judgments rendered by Division Benches of this Court in LPA No. 1678 of 2014 and in LPA No. 769 of 2021, whereby qua adults in a live-in relationship, the espoused protection for warding off threats arising from moral vigilants or from the close relatives of any of them, has been granted. However, it is made clear that if the petitioners commit any offence against the State or any person, this order shall not create any embargo or impediment to take appropriate action in accordance with law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 11.09. 2025 pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No PRIYANKA 2025.09.17 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document