Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100574 (ALL)

HEMANT KAUSHIK v. CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM / COMMISSION AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/33814/2025 · 2025-10-07

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33814 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ranjit Kumar Sagar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 and Sri Kundan Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5. 2. The petitioner has come up in the present petition with a sole prayer that a direction be issued to Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum / Commission, District Gautam Budh Nagar / respondent no. 1 to decide the Complaint Case No.505 of 2024 (Hemant Kaushik Vs. Bank of Baroda & others) pending before him expeditiously within a time bound period. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum / Commission, District Gautam Budh Nagar / respondent no. 1 to decide the Complaint Case No.505 of 2024 (Hemant Kaushik Vs. Bank of Baroda & others) pending before him expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. October 8, 2025 Arif Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Pandey, Prem Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana, C.S.C., Kundan Rai (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Hemant Kaushik .....Petitioner(s) Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum / Commission And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad