Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10057 (CHH)

DANIRAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1105/2025 · 2025-02-27

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9814 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1105 of 2025 1 Daniram S/o Jogiram Aged About 75 Years By Caste Verma, Resident Of Village Pandhi, Tahsil And P.S. Seepat, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.02.28 10:18:48 +0530 2 5 Tahsildar Tahsil Seepat, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Seepat, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 7 Sarpanch / Secretary Of Gram Panchayat Panchi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Gajendra Kumar Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s)/ State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 27/02/2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the show cause notice dated 02.01.2025, by which the Tahsildar is seeking explanation from the petitioner regarding his illegal encroachment over the government grass land bearing Khasra No. 140 area 2.630 hect situated at Village Khajri, Patwari Halka No. 18, Tahsil Seepat, District Bilaspur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has replied the show cause notice dated 02.01.2025 vide Annexure P-2 and the fine amount has also been deposited. 3. Learned State counsel submits that show cause notice dated 02.01.2025 has already been replied and Tahsildar will pass 3 appropriate orders in accordance with law by considering the reply of the show cause notice submitted by the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Looking to the submission made by the State counsel, as reply to the show cause notice has already been filed, Tahsildar, Seepat is directed to consider the reply filed by the petitioner and pass necessary orders in accordance with law within a period of 50 days, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- - (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti