Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10056 (CHH)

ASHOK KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1180/2025 · 2025-03-04

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10456 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1180 of 2025 1 - Ashok Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Garib Das Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kurud Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector, Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub Divisional OfÏcer (R) Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Sub Registrar Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Panel Lawyer. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.03.04 22:06:54 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 04.03.2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner who is the owner of land bearing Survey no. 239/2 & 240/1, area respectively 0.1300 and 0.1200 hectare, situated at Village: Kurud P.H.N. 14/19, new No. 49 revenue inspector circle Durg Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.), seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to sale the land owned by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not making any illegal plotting on the land, however, the petitioner wish to sale the land owned by him within the permissible limit. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that if the petitioner wish to sell the land within permissible limit, then the State has no objection to the contention of the petitioner and he may sell the land owned by him within permissible limit of land transactions without any plotting. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Perusal of the pleadings and documents, it is evident that the order of restriction of sale has been imposed by the authorities only to prevent illegal plotting. Since, the petitioner is stating that the petitioner wish to sell the total land owned by him within permissible limit of land transactions, there is nothing left to adjudicate, at this 3 stage and it is directed that the petitioner be permitted to sell his land without making any illegal plotting within permissible limit of land transactions. The petitioner is directed to intimate the concerned authorities at the time of sale of land. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib