Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100541 (ALL)

FIROZ v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/21878/2025 · 2025-09-23

Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21878 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better particulars. 2. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner as per Rules. September 24, 2025 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saroj Kumar Dubey, Vishwa Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Firoz .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad