Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100535 (ALL)

JITENDRA NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/33819/2025 · 2025-09-23

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33819 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, Sri Ashish Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. September 24, 2025 sailesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Malhotra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Jitendra Nishad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad