HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11655 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to direct the Civil Judge (J.D.), Azamgarh to decide the Case No. 07 of 2021 (Jiyarat Vs. Vasiuddin and another) within stipulated and reasonable this Hon'ble Court period as fixed by otherwise shall petitioners irreparable loss and injury.." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application under Order 39 Rule 2A read with Section 151 of C.P.C. registered as case no. 7 of 2021 is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.), Azamgarh to consider Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jiyarat (Since Deceased) And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Vasiuddin And Another .....Respondent(s) and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11655 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad