Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10048 (UTT)

AHSAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1453/2025 · 2025-10-15

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1453 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.N. Molakhi, learned D.A.G. for the State. 3. The applicant – Ahsan, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/FIR No. 554 of 2025, under Section 8 and 22 of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at P.S.- Laksar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 5. In this case, an FIR was lodged by the complainant on 23.05.2025, wherein, it was alleged that the applicant, on seeing the police personnel started running away and was caught immediately by the Police and upon asking the reason for running away, the applicant could not answer and confessed his guilt of carrying medical injections and tablet with him in a polythene and the alleged recovered quantity of Tramadol Hydrochloride injection was weighed about 8 ml and that of Alprazolam Tablets was 16.4 grams. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the alleged recovered quantity is much below the commercial quantity; and, that though there are previous criminal antecedents of the applicant, but, the applicant has not been convicted in any of the case. 7. Per contra, learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application and would submit that the applicant is a habitual offender having other cases of similar nature registered against him. 8. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the fact that the alleged recovered quantity is below the commercial quantity, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 9. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject the following conditions:- i) The applicant shall attend the trial Court regularly, and, he will not seek any unnecessary adjournment. ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case. iii) The applicant shall not leave India without any prior permission of the trial Court. 11. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution will be free to move the court for cancellation of bail. (Alok Mahra J.) 15.10.2025 Ujjwal