Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100469 (ALL)

RENUKA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/15236/2025 · 2025-10-08

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15236 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. Petitioner has claimed that she is a divorced daughter and was dependent on her father, a Government employee, who died in harness on 26.03.2024, therefore, she is entitled for family pension. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner refers the averments and documents annexed alongwith this writ petition in support of petitioner’s claim as well as that a representation filed before concerned respondent in this regard is still not decided. 4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for State- Respondents, fairly submits that if a fresh representation is filed within two weeks alongwith requisite documents, the same will be considered in accordance with law and in case of any legal impediment, the same will also be communicated to petitioner within a short period. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Verma, Reena Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Renuka Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 5. Learned counsel for petitioner has no objection if this writ petition is disposed of taking note of aforesaid submission made by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 6. In aforesaid circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of taking note note of aforesaid submissions as well as assurance given by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. October 9, 2025 AK WRIA No. 15236 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad