Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100464 (ALL)

DINANATH v. THE BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIB/3928/2025 · 2025-09-23

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3928 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Mr. Bimla Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of instant appeal, the pending stay application has been decided by Board of Revenue, as such, instant petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 24, 2025 Vandana Y. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Tripathi, Bimla Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Dinanath .....Petitioner(s) The Board Of Revenue U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad