Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10046 (AP)

MUTAKANA PEDA SAMBAIAH. & ANOTHER v. C.NAGARATHNAMMA/

SA/725/2001 · 2025-06-23

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

'SI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 77/; nc A*eal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree .fated 31-07-2001 passed in A.S No.37 of 1996 on the file of the Senior c™i Judge, Bapatia, Guntur District, which was preferred against the Judg(nent and Decree dated 01-04-1996 passed in OS No.95 of 1996 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge Between: 1. Mutkana Peda Sambaiah, Employee, R/o.Guntur. 2., Mandla Masthanamma, R/o.Penukudurupadu, Tenali Mandal PRADESH AT AMARAVATI OF JUNE Bapatia, Guntur District. S/o.Late Subbaiah, aged about 64 years. W/o.Venkataratnam Guntur District. ■-Appellants (Respondents/Defendants) AND W/o.Raghavaiah District. 50 years, Hindu, Chopparapu Nagarathnemma R/o.Vedullapalli, Bapatia Mandal, Guntur 60 Hindu, years. rm.no If *u ■•'^®spondent(Appellant/Plaintiff) Counsel for the Appellants ;Smt Kavitha Gottipati Counsel for the Respondent :Sri R. Radha Krishna Reddy (No representation) The Court made the following: APHC010112462001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 725 of 2001 Between: Mutakana Peda Sambaiah. & Another ...APPELLANT AND C Nagarathnamma/ ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. R RADHA KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following Judgment: Smt. Kavitha Gottipati, learned counsel for the appellants would submit inspite of her best efforts, the appellants are not coming forward to prosecute the appeal and hence, necessary orders may be rendered in this appeal. 2. No representation for the respondents. i 2 3. In that view of the matter, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. I / Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bapatia, Guntur District. (With records) The I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bapatia, Guntur District. One CC to Smt Kavitha Gottipati, Advocate [OPUC] 1. 2. 3. dhe CC to Sri R.Radha Krishna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] j I The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of AP at Amaravati. 4. 5. 6. Three CD Copies BSV nm HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.725 of 2001 I ? 2 SEP 2n?5 f ^ . Current section ^ tm I ini DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS