Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100454 (ALL)

SMT. LALTI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14528/2025 · 2025-09-23

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14528 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Kushmondeya Shahi, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3&4 and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the arrears of salary along with interest for the period 01.01.2016 till 31.03.2016 giving the benefits of the Pay matrix of the 7th Pay Commission in terms of the G.O dated 20.12.2016. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to refix the last pay drawn and the pension of the Petitioner in terms of the G.O dated 20.12.2016 giving the benefits of the Pay matrix of the 7 th Pay Commission. III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to give the pay increment along with dearness allowance for the period between 01.07.2015 till 31.03.2016. IV. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent 3 to decide the representation dated 23.10.2024 and 25.03.2025 (Annexure No.8 to this writ petition). V. To issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. VI. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nisheeth Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi Smt. Lalti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of her grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representation. However, despite representation moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that in case petitioner moves a fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3; District Basic Education Officer, Prayaggraj within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 24, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 14528 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad