Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100453 (ALL)

SANT KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/33944/2025 · 2025-10-07

Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33944 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Sitaram Yadav, learned counsel appearing along with Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, for the petitioners, Sri Dilip Kumar Kesarwani, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel representing the respondent- Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent No. 3, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Shahganj, District-Jaunpur, to decide an application stated to have been filed by the petitioners seeking demarcation. Counsel for the State respondents has pointed out that in regard to demarcation, there is a complete procedure prescribed under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the petitioners would be required to seek their remedy as per its terms. Counsel for the petitioners accordingly states that he does not wish to press the petition and that the petitioners would file appropriate application as per the procedure prescribed under the Code, with regard to their claim for demarcation. The petition stands disposed of. October 8, 2025 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kuldeep Maurya, Sitaram Yadav, Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Sant Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad