[2025:JHHC:11619] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2948 of 2025 ------ Sheikh Tanmeer, aged about 27 yrs., S/o Sheikh Asad, R/o Village- Chachkapi, P.O.- Sakra, P.S.- Bero, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand- 835301. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Navin Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-17-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jariyagarh P.S. Case No.33 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This is the second journey of the petitioner for regular bail in connection with Jariyagarh P.S. Case No.33 of 2023. Earlier the regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 24.07.2024 passed in B.A. No.4746 of 2024 and allied cases. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted Rs.1,80,000/- and other valuables from the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile three prosecution witnesses have been examined and the PW-1 and 2 have identified the petitioner in the T.I.P. It is also submitted that PW-1 in para-16 and PW-2 in para-9 of their deposition have stated that before they identified the petitioner in T.I.P., the petitioner was shown by them in police station. It is further submitted that the co- accused namely Seikh Rizwan @ Shekh Rizwan whose case stands in the same footing, has been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.03.2025 passed in B.A. No.1683 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.09.2023 and he has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Khunti in connection with Jariyagarh P.S. Case No.33 of 2023 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/