Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100436 (ALL)

SHYAM LAL SAGAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14561/2025 · 2025-09-23

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14561 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 13.06.2025 which is in the nature of punishment passed by District Judge, Badaun. Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned panel counsel appearing for the respondents submits that petitioner has an alternative remedy of statutory appeal under Rule 23(9)(ii) of U.P. State District Court Rules, 2013. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the same. In such above view of the matter, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter on account of alternative efficacious remedy of statutory appeal. Petition may avail remedy of statutory appeal, if he so advised. Subject to aforesaid liberty petition is consigned to records. September 24, 2025 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvajeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Mishra, C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Shyam Lal Sagar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad