CHANDRA PAL v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/32306/2024 · 2025-01-27
Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13418-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32306 of 2024 Petitioner :- Chandra Pal Respondent :- Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Anand Tiwari Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anand Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 and perused the record.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner whereby petition is aggrieved by the rejection of his complaints dated 23.11.2023 and 29.07.2024, whereby, his contention that location in the advertisement was not correct, has been rejected.
3. Upon perusal of the documents and upon checking the google map, it is clear that the National Highway No. 339 runs between villages Luhedi and Kaimaha. This Court has itself examine the google map and is clear that the National Highway No. 339 runs between aforesaid two villages.
4. In light of the same, the contention of the petitioner is rejected and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 27.1.2025 sailesh (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad