Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10041 (ALL)

RAMESH CHANDRA SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

WRIA/14262/2009 · 2025-09-07

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14262 of 2009 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Learned counsel for petitioner is not present. 2. This Court has passed following order on 18.03.2009 :- "Let the petitioner satisfy the Court that he had completed all the formalities within the prescribed period and had also submitted no dues certificate to show that the delay in payment of pension was wholly attributable to the department to claim interest on one year's delay in making payment of pension." 3. No subsequent document is filed even after 16 years, therefore, the Court is of the opinion that since no document has been filed in terms of aforesaid order, the relief sought cannot be allowed. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. 4. This order is passed in absence of counsel for petitioner, therefore, a copy of this order be sent to petitioner on his given address. September 8, 2025 P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : H.M. Srivastava, Neeraj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ramesh Chandra Saxena .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad