MATA PRASAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/34616/2025 · 2025-10-05
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100406 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100406 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34616 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. It is contended that an order under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was passed, which was carried out and pillars were affixed. The private respondents had, thereafter, removed the said pillars. An application was moved by petitioner on 5.8.2025 before the respondent no. 2 for restoring the same.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No.2 to consider and decide the application dated 5.8.2025 filed by petitioner, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. October 6, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bijay Kumar Srivastava, Devendra Kumar Bind, Zainab Parveen Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mata Prasad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad