Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10040 (CHH)

GANESH RAM v. SAFEDRAM PRADHAN

MCC/163/2023 · 2025-09-24

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:49288 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 163 of 2023 1 - Ganesh Ram S/o Late Rajaram Aged About 40 Years Caste - Kolta R/o Village Gosaideeh Tehsil Gharghoda District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - Safedram Pradhan S/o Late Rajaram Aged About 55 Years Caste - Kolta, R/o Village Gosaideeh Tehsil Gharghoda District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Rajendra Patel and Mr. Ritesh Giri, Advocates For Respondent No.1 : Mr. S.A. Ansari, Advocate For Respondent No.2/State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.09.26 10:52:03 +0530 2 25/09/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No.01/2023, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 2. Upon due consideration and for the reason assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned. 3. Also heard on application for restoration of SA No.99/2016 (Ganesh Ram vs. Safedram Pradhan and another). 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the earlier counsel has already issued the NOC and the new counsel had not filed the power on behalf of the applicant, therefore, the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and the reasons assigned in the application and further considering that sufficient cause has been shown, I am inclined to allow the instant MCC. 6. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. SA No.99/2016 is restored to its original number. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka