HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12054 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue, a suitable order or direction, directing the Civil Judge (J.D.), Jaunpur to conclude & decide the application 6C alongwith affidavit 7Ga. of the petitioners in Case No. 647 of 2025 (Ramchandra and another Vs. Ramashankar and others), pending before the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Jaunpur, preferably and expeditiously within stipulated time as fix by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar, Sandeep Kumar Sharma, Surendra Kumar Gautam Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramchandra And Another .....Petitioner(s) Ramashankar And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.), Jaunpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 6, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12054 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad