Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100376 (ALL)

SURESH CHAND MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15230/2025 · 2025-10-08

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15230 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Gyan Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 & 3 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to grant the pension and post retiral benefits to the petitioner from the date of superannuation, i.e. 31.12.2022 alongwith interest as well as further prayer to direct the respondents to decide the representation dated 19.07.2025 of the petitioner within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for the grant of pension and post retiral benefits as the controversy involved in the present case has already been settled in the case of Suresh Chandra Shukla vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others passed in Writ-A No. 46867 of 2014 decided on 06.05.2025. In this regard, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representation dated 19.07.2025, but nothing has been done till date. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2&3 submits that in case petitioner moves a fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Agam Prakash Satsangi, Chetan Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Singh Suresh Chand Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3; Additional Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Prayagraj within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, keeping in mind the observation made in the case of Suresh Chandra Shukla (supra) by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 9, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 15230 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad