Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10036 (GAU)

SIRAJUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

WP(C)/1844/2025 · 2025-04-03

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No. 1/2 GAHC010067022025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1844/2025 SIRAJUL HOQUE SON OF LATE SAFIQUE ALI, VILLAGE ILASHPUR, BARAIGRAM, SRI BHUMI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI 37 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRI BHUMI PIN 78871 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H LASKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELECTION COMMISSION., SC, P AND R.D.,GA, ASSAM Page No. 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 04.04.2025 Mr. N.H. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development [P&RD] Department for the respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4 and Ms. A.B. Kayastha, learned counsel representing Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Election Commission [ASEC] for the respondent no. 2 are present and submitted that they have no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stand dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant