HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34025 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 4 and learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon respondent no.2 to decide the appeal dated 21.7.2025 filed by petitioner under Rule 6 of the Uttar Pradesh Employment Guarantee Grievance Redressal Mechanism Rules, 2009. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that even after expiry of sufficient period, petitioner's appeal has not been considered, till date. 4. Learned Standing Counsel states that in case petitioner's appeal has not been considered so far, the same shall be examined by the competent authority in accordance with law. 5. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.2 to accord consideration to petitioner's pending appeal, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of two months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. 6. It is, however, clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and all issues are left open to be considered by the authority competent, at the first instance. October 9, 2025 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Achal Singh, C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Vir Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad