IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 198 of 2021 Decided on: 01.04.2025 ______________________________________________________________ Piar Singh ....Petitioner Versus Principal Secretary Education and others .…Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. _______________________________________________________________ Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Sushant Keprate, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Ms. Swati Draik, Deputy Advocate General. . Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Judge (oral) It is not in dispute that in terms of the judgment passed by this Court, the entire dues of the petitioner stands paid. As regards parity with Prakash Chand, the respondents have clearly pointed out that his pay has been wrongly fixed and they are taking steps to recover the same. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. In such circumstances, since the petitioner cannot claim negative parity, the instant petition is disposed of, being fully satisfied. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of . ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) 01st April, 2025 Judge (raman) 2