M/S JAY PEE CONSTRUCTION v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHER
WRIC/33403/2025 · 2025-09-22
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100314 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100314 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33403 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Jai Bahadur, learned counsel for Nagar Nigam and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent-authority is not releasing the payment of Rs. 2,19,098/- due to him against two bills, being Bill No. 745A dated 23.05.2022 and Bill No. 746A dated 28.06.2022. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent- authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no. 4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no. 4 Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Saharanpur, U.P.. within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no. 4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 23, 2025 Sumaira Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jai Bahadur Singh (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) M/S Jay Pee Construction .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad