IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (124) SAMIM AHMED CHIMMAN LAL AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. for the petitioner. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL 1. Petitioner Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 08.05.2025, vide which, his evidence as plaintiff was closed by the Court below. 2. Perusal of the history sheet of the case shows opportunities has been granted to the petitioner, which included many last opportunities and number of times, cost was also imposed and petitioner was highly negligent and has failed to pay the cost of adjournment subjecting himself to cl Section 35(B magnanimous enough to grant petitioner further more opportunities but even in spite of availing those many opportunities, petitioner failed conclude the evidence. The conduct of the petitioner is highly negligent but IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of Decision: SAMIM AHMED Versus CHIMMAN LAL AND OTHERS -.- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Mr. Balwan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) Petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 22 Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 08.05.2025, vide which, his evidence as plaintiff was closed by the Court Perusal of the history sheet of the case shows opportunities has been granted to the petitioner, which included many last opportunities and number of times, cost was also imposed and petitioner was highly negligent and has failed to pay the cost of adjournment subjecting himself to closure of his evidence in view o Section 35(B) of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) but the Court was magnanimous enough to grant petitioner further more opportunities but even in spite of availing those many opportunities, petitioner failed conclude the evidence. The conduct of the petitioner is highly negligent but IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6358-2025 Date of Decision:-11.09.2025 … Petitioner ... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 08.05.2025, vide which, his evidence as plaintiff was closed by the Court Perusal of the history sheet of the case shows that 16 effective opportunities has been granted to the petitioner, which included many last opportunities and number of times, cost was also imposed and petitioner was highly negligent and has failed to pay the cost of adjournment osure of his evidence in view of the provisions of ) of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) but the Court was magnanimous enough to grant petitioner further more opportunities but even in spite of availing those many opportunities, petitioner failed to conclude the evidence. The conduct of the petitioner is highly negligent but of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 08.05.2025, vide which, his evidence as plaintiff was closed by the Court that 16 effective opportunities has been granted to the petitioner, which included many last opportunities and number of times, cost was also imposed and petitioner was highly negligent and has failed to pay the cost of adjournment f the provisions of ) of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) but the Court was magnanimous enough to grant petitioner further more opportunities but to conclude the evidence. The conduct of the petitioner is highly negligent but SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.09.11 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document considering the interest of justice, the present petition is allowed and one last opportunity is awarded to the petitioner to conclude his evidence subject to payment of cost petitioner would produce the evidence at his own responsibility and in case, Dasti summons are required, he can move to the Court for taking summons. 3. Pending application(s), if any, is/are dispose 11.09.2025 S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Whether reportable? considering the interest of justice, the present petition is allowed and one last opportunity is awarded to the petitioner to conclude his evidence subject to payment of cost of Rs.30,000/- to be paid petitioner would produce the evidence at his own responsibility and in case, summons are required, he can move to the Court for taking Pending application(s), if any, is/are dispose (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No considering the interest of justice, the present petition is allowed and one last opportunity is awarded to the petitioner to conclude his evidence to be paid to the respondent. The petitioner would produce the evidence at his own responsibility and in case, summons are required, he can move to the Court for taking Dasti Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of accordingly. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No considering the interest of justice, the present petition is allowed and one last opportunity is awarded to the petitioner to conclude his evidence to the respondent. The petitioner would produce the evidence at his own responsibility and in case, Dasti SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.09.11 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document