Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100295 (ALL)

JAGDISH PRASAD TIWARI @ JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/33746/2025 · 2025-10-07

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33746 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. There is certain discrepancy in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. 2. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. October 8, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Dutta Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Jagdish Prasad Tiwari @ Jagdish Prasad Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad