Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10028 (RAJ)

MANGLI AND ANR v. BOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS

CW/4169/2006 · 2025-05-07

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19246] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4169/2006 1. Mangli Daughter Of Late Shri Moti, Jarunda, Tehsil Jam- varamgarh, District Jaipur. 2. Birdi Daughter Of Moti, Wife Of Pratap, Village Vanyawala, Tehsil Jamvaramgarh, District Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer 2. Additional Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur 3. Sub- Divisional Officer, Amer Headquarter, Jaipur 4. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Rampur, Panchayat Samiti, Jamvaramgarh, District Jaipur 5. Tehsildar, Gram, Jarunda, Tehsil Jamvaramgarh, District Jaipur. 6. Mool Chand Son Of Moti Meena, Jarunda, Tehsil Jam- varamgarh, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms.Rani Bhandari Ms.Gunjan Chawla with Mr.Harshit Parashar for Mr.Neeraj Batra, GC. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/05/2025 1. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.6 submits that respondent No.6, i.e., Mool Chand has expired on 06.09.2013 and this fact was intimated to this Court by way of filing an application on 07.10.2015 along-with death certificate of Mool Chand. Counsel submits that copy of the said application was supplied in the Office [2025:RJ-JP:19246] (2 of 2) [CW-4169/2006] of counsel for the petitioner on 07.10.2015 itself. Counsel submits that in spite of passing of more than 10 years, till date, application for substitution of the legal representatives of the sole private respondent No.6 has not been submitted for their substitution on the record, hence, under these circumstances, the petition stands abated. 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition stands dismissed as abated as the legal representatives of the sole contesting deceased respondent No.6, i.e., Mool Chand have not been substituted on the record. 4. All application(s) (pending, if any) also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /50