HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33425 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State. 2. At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts and prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 23, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Prajapati, Mahesh Kumar, Maheshwari Prasad Srivastava, Surendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Kumari Durgesh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad