Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100262 (ALL)

KANTI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14448/2025 · 2025-09-22

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14448 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh Kachhawah, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 5 and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.4 to regularize the service of the petitioner from the date of his initial appointment dated 11.02.1999 and to pay regular pay scale and annual increments also direct the respondents to pay arrear of salary along with interest and also provide the benefits of old pension scheme. ii. Issue a writ in nature of mandamus and direct the respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 05.05.2025 and 02.09.2025 (Annexure Nos.7&8). iii. Issue a such other and further wit, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case so that justice be done. iv. To award the cost of the writ petition through out to the petitioner as against the respondents." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of her grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhanu Pratap Singh Kachhawah, C.S.C. Kanti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) moving representation. However, despite representation moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the respondents-BSA submits that in case petitioner moves a fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3; Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P. at Prayagraj, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 23, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 14448 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad