Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100260 (ALL)

SMT. ARADHANA DEVI @ ROOPA AND ANOHTER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/3537/2025 · 2025-09-23

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3537 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicants is that a direction be issued to the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court no. 2, Prayagraj to decide the Case No. 483 of 2024,, (Smt. Aradhana and another Vs. Sunil Verma), Under Section 125 Cr.P.C., P.S.- Puramufti, District Prayagraj, within a short stipulated period. 3. Considering the facts of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the applicant's case, this application U/s 529 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of with a direction to the court below concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment. September 24, 2025 A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Kumar, Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Smt. Aradhana Devi @ Roopa And Anohter .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad