W.P.No.34610 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.No34610 of 2025 & WMP No.38795 of 2025 Varsha Singh ... Petitioner Versus 1.The Chief Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, 763, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 2. The General Manager, Human Resource Management Department, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, 763, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Senior Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Rajajipuram Branch, District Lucknow. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 09.06.2025 to transfer the petitioner to Lucknow or any region nearby to Lucknow or any place in North India on compassionate grounds. For Petitioner : Mr.G.V.Viyyash Kumar 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.34610 of 2025 For Respondents : Mr.K.Srinivasa Murthy for Mr.N.G.R. Prasad ORDER By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. 2.The case of the petitioner is that she has been suffering from Chronic Anxiety Disorder/Acute Stress Reaction and at present she is working in Vettavallam Branch, Vellore Region, Tamil Nadu and that she has been transferred in violation of the Banks Transfer Policy of Indian Overseas Bank and she had given a representation on 09.06.2025 to the second respondent seeking transfer to any other region near Lucknow and since the said representation is pending consideration, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of present writ petition. 3. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner was transferred and posted to Vellore pursuant to the promotion. However, he would submit that there is no proof that the representation of 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.34610 of 2025 the petitioner has been received by the respondents. 5.In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to give representation to the second respondent afresh within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereafter. 6.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 17.09.2025 raa A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.34610 of 2025 raa W.P.No34610 of 2025 & WMP No.38795 of 2025 17.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis