ATIK AHMAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/33642/2025 · 2025-09-23
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100247 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 100247 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33642 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. It is contended that petitioners had instituted a declaratory suit under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, which was decreed, against which private respondents had filed an appeal in which petitioners have filed their objections, which are pending consideration. The sole prayer made in writ petition for expeditious disposal of the appeal alongwith the objections filed by petitioners.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon the respondent no. 3 to decide the Appeal No. C-202515000002062 alongwith the objections filed by petitioners, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 24, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devbratt Yadav, Ram Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Atik Ahmad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad