HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33826 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel for respondent no.2 & 3. 2. Petitioner disputes the correctness of the computation of electricity dues being claimed from him. Against connection for load one kilowatt, the petitioner is being built for two kilowatt load. Thus, dues Rs.2,29,947/- are being claimed from him. 3. Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel for Distribution Corporation contends otherwise. Thus, fact disputes exists that may not be gone into a revenue jurisdiction. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.30,000/- within one month he may file appropriate application under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Board, 2005 within a period of one week thereafter. Subject to such compliance being made the objection that may be filed by the petitioner may be dealt with and decide it on its own merits by reasoned and speaking order after giving brief opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. October 8, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : B.D. Shukla, L P Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manu Ghildyal (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Satya Prabha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad