Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10023 (KAR)

MALLAMMA AND ANR v. PARAMMA AND ANR

RSA/200208/2024 · 2025-06-23

Ravi V Hosmani

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3311 RSA No. 200208 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200208 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. MALLAMMA W/O LAXMAN KUDARE, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O: RAIKOD VILLAGE, TQ: CHINCHOLI, DISTRICT : KALABURAGI. NOW AT R/O: TUMKUNTA VILLAGE, CHINCHOLI, TQ: KALABURAGI DISTRICT. 2. PANCHASHEELA D/O LAXMAN KUDARE, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O: TUMKUNTA VILLAGE, CHINCHOLI TQ KALABURAGI DIST. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) AND: 1. PARAMMA W/O LATE LAXMAN, WRONGLY SHOWN BUT ACTUALLY BAKKAPPA MADARGI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 2. ASHWINI D/O LAXMAN, WRONGLY SHOWN BUT ACTUALLY BAKKAPPA MADARGI, Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3311 RSA No. 200208 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, BOTH R/O: CHANGLERA VILLAGE, TQ: HUMNABAD, BIDAR: DISTRICT HUMNABAD TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.10.2023 DISMISSING THE APPEAL OF THE APPELLANTS IN R.NO.06/2022 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHINCHOLI AND ALLOWED THE SUIT IN O.S.NO.126/2014 DATED 23.03.2022 FILED BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHINCHOLI AT CHINCHOLI GULBARGA IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation. Matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for 5th time. There is no compliance despite sufficient opportunity. Same would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE Psg*: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2