SRI SURAPANENI ANIL KMAR v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
WP/5932/2025 · 2025-05-08
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10023 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10023 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 5932 OF 2025 Between: Sri Surapaneni Anil Kumar, S/o Late Sivaji Rao, aged about 39 years, R/o Door No. 6-43/C, Near Sai Bab Temple, Kotha Veluru, Bapulapadu Mandalam, Krishna - 521110, AP . ...Petitioner AND
1. The Authorized Officer, The Gandhi Co - Operative Urban Bank Ltd, No. H. 948, Museum Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada, AP - 520002
2. The Branch Manager, The Gandhi Co - Operative, Urban Bank Ltd, Situated at Vijayawada Road, Hanuman Junction, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District, AP-5221105
3. The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Visakapatnam. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in trying to dispossess the petitioner therein from his house bearing may
Survey No. 266/6, Assessment No. 539, with door No. 6-43/C 232 Sq.yards near Sal Baba Temple, Kothaveleru, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District through an Advocate Commissioner and also trying to conduct auction pending the S.A. No. 577 of 2024 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, AP, at Visakhapatnam is wholly unjust, illegal, arbitrary, with bias and violative of schools of natural justice and Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 an extent of 19, 21 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 and 2 not to dispossess the petitioner from his house bearing Survey Survey No. 266/6, Assessment No. 539, with door No. 6- 43/C, an extent of 232 Sq.yards near Sai Baba Temple Kothaveleru Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KRISHNA KISHORE BHATRAJU Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI P A SESHU The Court made the following order:
9k Bench Sr.No:-5 [3483] COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at amaravati WRIT PETITION NO; 5932 of 2025 APHC010112772025 ||y| ^IGH ...Petitioner Sri Surapaneni Anil Kumar Vs.
...Respondents The Authorized Officer and others ********** None Advocate for petitioner Advocate for respondents Sri P. A. Seshu ^ CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ; 9th May 2025 CORAM ;THE DATE PC ; the earlier occasion, there was no None for the. petitioner^ Even on representationjor the petitiorler. is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Accordingly, this Writ Petition is
order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
2.
Sd/- A. ViJAYA BABU assistant REGIS ikAK //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI. KRISHNA KISHORE BHATRAJU Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI. P A SESHU Advocate [OPUC]
3. Three CD Copies GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.5932 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS