159 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SUDHIR KUMAR S DR. RAJA SEKHAR VUNDRU AND ANTOHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Vishwajeet, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MAN Learned 22.05.2024 passed in CWP such, he does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, delayed disbursal of interest filing representation before the quarter concerned within a two weeks from per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shal conveyed to the petitioner case of any delay would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/ his/her own pocket. 23.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SUDHIR KUMAR SAGWAL Versus DR. RAJA SEKHAR VUNDRU AND ANTOHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Vishwajeet, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 22.05.2024 passed in CWP-11729-2024 has been complied with, as such, he does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, with regard to claim of the petitioner delayed disbursal of interest, he would be at liberty to raise filing representation before the quarter concerned within a from the release of payments, which shall be dealt with per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shal conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the part of respondent would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/ his/her own pocket. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4152-2024 Date of Decision: January 23, 2025 ........Petitioner DR. RAJA SEKHAR VUNDRU AND ANTOHER .......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Vishwajeet, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 2024 has been complied with, as such, he does not press the present petition. claim of the petitioner towards would be at liberty to raise his claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of the release of payments, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be within a period of two weeks thereafter and in on the part of respondent, the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner from (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 January 23, 2025 counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 2024 has been complied with, as towards claim by of , as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its l be within a period of two weeks thereafter and in the officer concerned from TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.24 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document