KUSUM RANA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/1157/2025 · 2025-03-03
Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi, Vivek Kumar Birla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10020 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10020 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30840-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1157 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kusum Rana And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- Ajit Narain Mishra,G.A.,Sunil Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
1. List of fresh cases has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA are present for the State Respondents.
3. This petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned First Information Report dated 06.06.2024 registered as Case Crime No.210 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station-Beta-2, District-Commissionerate, G.B. Nagar and further not to arrest the petitioners pursuant to said FIR.
4. On 07.02.2025 following order was passed:-
"1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned A.G.A for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are willing to refund the disputed amount along with interest, which was paid by respondent no.4 at the time of entering into the agreement to sell, through ECS or demand draft.
3. Learned A.G.A has opposed the submission of counsel for the petitioners.
4. Matter requires consideration.
5. Issue notice to the respondent no.4.
6. Steps be taken within a week.
7. Put up this matter on 24th February, 2025 as fresh case before the appropriate court.
9. Till then, the respondents are restrained from arresting the petitioners pursuant to the impugned First Information Report dated 06-06-2024,
registered as Case Crime No.210 of 2024, under Sections- 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C, Police Station- Beta-2, District- Commissionerate G.B. Nagar."
5. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that some amount has been refunded but the entire amount, as promised by the petitioners, has not been refunded.
6. Now, today no one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition.
7. In such view of the matter, interim order, granted earlier, stands vacated.
8. The petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Nitendra Digitally signed by :- NITENDRA TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad