Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100188 (ALL)

RAMZAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/14782/2025 · 2025-09-24

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14782 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner. None appears on behalf of concerned respondent. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court that despite he got retired on 31.01.2025, the amount of gratuity is still not paid. Learned counsel for petitioner refers the document annexed along with this writ petition. 3. There is no advance service upon concerned respondent, still considering that this is an issue of payment of gratuity, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of that on basis of a fresh representation if filed by petitioner, his grievance will be considered in accordance with law and in case of any legal impediment, the same shall be informed to petitioner by the concerned respondent. September 25, 2025 P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arbind Kumar Soni, Ashutosh Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ramzan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad