Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10017 (JHR)

BIJAY KUMAR SINHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2218/2025 · 2025-04-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:10576] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2218 of 2025 ------ Bijay Kumar Sinha, aged about 35 years, son of Kameshwar Prasad Sinha, resident of 505, Mohalichuwan, near Kiran Public School, Koldiha, Mohulichuan, P.O. Giridih, P.S. Nagar, Dist.-Giridih (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prakash Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07-04-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.212 of 2023 instituted under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the I.P.C., the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused attempted to murder the informant and inflicted injuries to him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that because of marital discord between the brother of the petitioner and the sister of the informant, who is the wife of the brother of the petitioner, this false case has been foisted. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and he will not go to or near the place of occurrence. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No.212 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant and his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and he will not go to near the place of occurrence and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/