Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10015 (UTT)

BOBBY ANAND v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/886/2024 · 2025-05-13

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.886 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA and Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State are present. 3. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned for the reasons stated in the affidavit. Delay condonation application (IA No.2/2024) thus stands disposed of. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 4. Learned State Counsel supplied the instructions dated 27.02.2025 to the Court, which are taken on record. On instructions, he made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge- sheet has been filed against petitioner on 25.11.2024. 5. In view of statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 60. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 13.05.2025 AK