GANESH @ LINGAN v. THE STATE REP BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CRL OP/67/2025 · 2025-01-20
A D Jagadish Chandira
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10015 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10015 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.01.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 Ganesh @ Lingan ... Petitioner Vs. State, Represented by The Inspector of Police Arambakkam Police Station Thiruvallur District (Crime No.531 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.531 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Chandrasekar For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 O R D E R Petition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.531 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(4), 311 BNS is on board for consideration. 2.The incarceration of the petitioner being from 30.11.2024 pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. He also submits that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offences and he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court. 3.The case of the prosecution, as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of bail, is that on 28.11.2024 the petitioner along with other accused entered into the shop of the de facto complainant, threatened him at knife point and robbed a 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 sum of Rs.2,000/- and 7.4 sovereigns of gold chain from him. He further submits that there are 37 previous cases pending against the petitioner, which are as follows: S.No. Police Station Cr.No. Sections
1. K6 T.P.Chatram 278/2005 379 IPC
2. J1 Saidapet 372/2008 147, 148, 302, 506(ii) r/w.120(b) IPC
3. K6 T.P.Chatram 29/2009 379 IPC
4. K6 T.P.Chatram 181/2009 41 CI (ii) r/w.102 CRPC
5. K4 Anna Nagar 1143/2009 379 IPC
6. K6 T.P.Chatram 812/2009 379 IPC (snatching)
7. V5 Thirumangalam 1018/2009 384, 506(ii) IPC
8. K6 T.P.Chatram 23/2010 336, 341, 427, 397, 506(ii) IPC
9. P6 Kodungaiyur 881/2011 379, 511 IPC
10. P6 Kodungaiyur 1084/2011 379 IPC
11. P6 Kodungaiyur 1087/2011 379 IPC
12. P6 Kodungaiyur 1198/2011 341, 336, 427, 397, 506(ii) IPC
13. V5 Thirumangalam 896/2011 392 IPC
14. V5 Thirumangalam 1026/2011 341, 336, 427, 397, 506(ii) IPC
15. K4 Anna Nagar 1424/2011 392 IPC
16.
K6 T.P.Chatram 868/2011 457, 380 IPC
17. G3 Kilpauk 530/2013 379 IPC
18. T11 Thiunindravur 72/2014 341, 294(b), 427, 392, 506(ii) IPC
19. NIB CID Chennai 43/2015 20(b) NDPS Act 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 S.No. Police Station Cr.No. Sections
20. K4 Anna Nagar 533/2015 379 IPC (Snatching)
21. K4 Anna Nagar 602/2015 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 307, 397, 506(ii) IPC
22. K3 Aminjikarai 1193/2015 379 IPC
23. K3 Aminjikarai 1002/2015 379 IPC
24. K3 Aminjikarai 1246/2015 379 IPC
25. K6 T.P.Chatram 1352/2015 341, 392, 506(ii) IPC @ 341, 392, 506(ii)
26. K8 Arumbakkam 469/2016 379 IPC
27. K8 Arumbakkam 498/2016 379 IPC
28. K4 Anna Nagar 474/2016 341, 394(b), 336, 427, 397, 506(ii) IPC
29. K6 T.P.Chatram 1654/2016 75 CP Act r/w.71 CI Act
30. K6 T.P.Chatram 77/2017 392, 506(ii), r/w.397 IPC
31. K6 T.P.Chatram 78/2017 341, 294(b), 324 IPC
32. K6 T.P.Chatram 204/2018 341m 294(b), 329, 506(ii) IPC
33. N3 Mithiyal Pet 235/2018 341, 294(b), 324 IPC
34. K6 T.P.Chatram 93/2019 294(b), 341, 324, 307, 506(ii) IPC
35. K6 T.P.Chatram 277/2019 341, 294(b), 324 r/w.397, 506(ii) IPC
36. K6 T.P.Chatram 18/2020 341, 294(b), 324, 336, 307, 397, 506(ii) IPC
37. W4 AWPS 07/2020 376(2),(j)(k)(L), 307, 450 IPC 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 4.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record and considering the previous cases pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 20.01.2025 sai To 1.The Inspector of Police Arambakkam Police Station Thiruvallur District 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. sai Crl.O.P.No.67 of 2025 20.01.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis