Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10013 (CHH)

LAKHMU RAM (KASHYAP) v. THE CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIIMITED,

WPS/2005/2018 · 2025-06-19

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26369 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2005 of 2018 1 - Lakhmu Ram (Kashyap) S/o Late Shri Mahangu Ram (Kashyap) Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kondawal, Sandhipara, Titirgaon, District Bastar Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Liimited, (A Government Of Chhattisgarh Undertaking), Through Its Managing Director, Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Through Its Director General Manager (Hrd), Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Executive Director (H.R.), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Executive Director, (O And M), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Executive Engineer (O And M), Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Alok Kumar Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. K.R. Nair, Advocate 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 20-06-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of petitioner, namely, Mahangu Ram who was working as Assistant Line Man under the respondents died in harness on 22.06.2000. He further submits that application for compassionate appointment was moved by petitioner on 11.08.2000 but till date, same has not been considered. He prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to consider his application. 2) On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that after long 25 years, it would not be apt to consider the application of petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment. 3) Heard. 4) Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Dewangan, this petition is hereby being disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consider and decide the pending application so moved by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. Petitioner would be at liberty to make fresh representation too. 5) With the aforesaid direction(s), this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.06.20 17:59:48 +0530