HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34542 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a restoration application is pending in mutation proceedings. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction to the authority concerned to decide the case no. RST/17788 of 2025 (Shailesh @ Shailendra Kumar versus Mamta and others), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 6, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Pandey, Kamlesh Kumar Bharti Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mamta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad