Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10010 (UTT)

MS RAM ASSOCIATES VIKAS COLONY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2371/2025 · 2025-09-10

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8011 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2371 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Anil Dabral, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Nailwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent No.1. 3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to learned Tehsildar, District Haridwar to decide case No.769/ 2024-25 Anirudh Kumar Katiyar Vs. Sunil Kumar, under Section 34/35 of the LR Act, expeditiously. 4. Today, learned State Counsel passed on to this Court written instructions dated 08.09.2025, which is taken on record. On the basis of said instructions, it is informed that the aforesaid case has already been decided finally on 12.12.2024. 5. In view of subsequent development, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 10.09.2025 PN