Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 100098 (PAT)

Fakir Rishidev v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./29991/2025 · 2025-09-26

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29991 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2024 Thana- MAHALGAON District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Fakir Rishidev S/o Late Etvari Rishidev Resident of Chainpur, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Araria 2. Krishna Rishidev S/o Late Etvari Rishidev Resident of Chainpur, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Araria 3. Sakaldev Rishidev S/o Fakir Rishidev Resident of Chainpur, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Araria 4. Surya Kant Rishidev @ Surjanand Rishidev S/o Ramu Rishidev @ Ramanand Rishidev Resident of Chainpur, Masuria, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Araria 5. Ramu Rishidev @ Ramanand Rishidev S/o Late Asharfi Rishidev Resident of Chainpur, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Araria 6. Tetar Rishidev @ Tilak Chand Rishidev S/o Hathi Rishidev Resident of Chainpur, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Araria 7. Arjun Rishidev S/o Kusheshwar Rishidev @ Bokai Rishidev R/o ward no. 6, near Purab tola, Mushari, Koch Gaon, Rampur Kodarkatti, P.s.- Forbisganj, Distt.- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devi Das Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 192, 109, 121(1), 121(2), 333, 118(1), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29991 of 2025(2) dt.26-09-2025 2/2 accused persons, including these petitioners and 250-300 unknown male and female persons, armed with lathi, abused and attacked informant and other police officials. It is further alleged that in course of scuffle, one lady A.S.I. received arrow injury near her eye and another A.S.I., namely, Birendra Kumar Nut, also received injuries. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that there is specific and direct accusation that all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including these petitioners and 250-300 unknown persons abused and attacked upon informant and police party as a result of which several police personnel sustained injuries. 6. Considering the nature and seriousness of accusation, prayer for bail of the petitioners is refused. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T