DILIP KUMAR SAWLANI S/O SHRI TEERTH DAS JI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1392/2025 · 2025-07-30
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10009 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10009 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28870] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1392/2025
1. Dilip Kumar Sawlani S/o Shri Teerth Das Ji, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Plot No 4 , B -A -23 Sector , 4 Jawahar, Nagar Jaipur (Raj). 2. Hema Sawlani ( Smt.) W/o Dilip Kumar Sawlani, Resident Of Plot No 4 , B -A -23 Sector , 4 Jawahar, Nagar Jaipur (Raj). 3. Hitesh Kumar Sawlani S/o Dilip Kumar Sawlani, Resident Of Plot No 4 , B -A -23, Sector 4 Jawahar, Nagar Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Subhash Chandra S/o Munei Ram, R/o H.no. 56, Cd, Nr. Malsisar Apartments, Civil Lines, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7793/2024
1. Subhash Chandra Sihag S/o Shri Muniram Sihag, R/o 56, Near Malsisar Apartment, Civil Lines, Hawa Sadak, Road, Jaipur
2. Sikander Singh S/o Shri Sukhdev Singh, R/o Village Sahanagar Post Hazartpur, Hazaratpur Khiri, Utter Pradesh
3. Puran Mal Sharma S/o Shri Ganpat Ram Sharma, R/o 3- Ba-23, Near Mps School, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Hitesh Sawlani S/o Shri Dileep Kumar Sawlani, R/o 4-Ba- 23, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:28870] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1392/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Shanker Sharma in SBCRLMP No.1392/2025 Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Sudhir Jain in SBCRLMP No.7393/2024 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Sudhir Jain in SBCRLMP No.1392/2025 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 30/07/2025 In the instant matter, cross FIRs are lodged. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner(s) that matters pertain to a civil dispute. Howsoever, learned counsel for the respondent has objected to the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner and has submitted that the FIR lodged by the petitioner is to shrouding and obscuring the forgery committed against the respondent. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that cross FIRs are lodged; that interim protection is granted in favour of respective parties, this Court deems it apposite to direct the Investigating Officer to conduct the investigation in light of the circular dated 10.06.2025 passed by Director General of Police and in accordance with the law and as per the facts.
Further, outcome of the investigation be filed within a period of three months. Further, it is directed that no coercive action be taken against the respective parties subject to joining the investigation. It is
[2025:RJ-JP:28870] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1392/2025] made clear that the said interim protection is operational till submission of the outcome of the investigation. In view the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/36-37