Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10009 (GAU)

SAHAR ALI AND 4 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.

Crl.Pet./310/2020 · 2025-04-01

Kaushik Goswami

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010067052020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./310/2020 SAHAR ALI AND 4 ORS. S/O- SIDDIQUE ALI, R/O- VILL- DHEKIAJANI PATHER, P.O. NIMUA, P.S. SALBARI, DIST.- BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN- 781315 2: SIDDIQUE ALI S/O- AFSAR ALI R/O- VILL- DHEKIAJANI PATHER P.O. NIMUA P.S. SALBARI DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781315 3: SHARBHANU BEGUM W/O- SIDDIQUE ALI R/O- VILL- DHEKIAJANI PATHER P.O. NIMUA P.S. SALBARI DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781315 4: JAHANARA KHATUN W/O- MD. KASIM KHAN R/O- VILL- DHEKIAJANI GAON P.O. NIMUA P.S. SALBARI DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781315 5: MD. RAHMAT ALI KHAN S/O- LT. KATU KHAN R/O- VILL- DHEKIAJANI GAON Page No.# 2/3 P.O. NIMUA P.S. SALBARI DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 78131 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE LD. P.P., ASSAM 2:TAIJUDDIN KHAN S/O- MD. ABDUL RAHMAN KHAN R/O- VILL- DHEKIAJANI GAON P.O. NIMUA P.S. SALBARI DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781315 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT- C/O- BHUPENDRA PAUL SINGH H.NO. 119 BIRUBARI SHANKARPUR P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR P.S. PALTAN BAZAR GHY-16 DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781016 3:AMIDA KHATUN D/O- MD. ABDUL RAHMAN KHAN @ ABDUR RAHMAN KHAN R/O- VILL- DHEKIAJANI GAON P.S. SALBARI DIST.- BAKSA ASSAM PRESENTLY RESIDING AT- C/O- BHUPENDRA PAUL SINGH H.NO. 119 BIRUBARI SHANKARPUR P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR P.S. PALTAN BAZAR GHY-16 DIST.- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 78101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED, MD Y ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. A KHATUN,MR. A AHMED,MD A RAHMAN Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 02.04.2025 None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 and Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. It appears that this matter was listed today in the order column with remark “For Dismissal” as on the last occasion i.e. 28.03.2025 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. However, today also despite the names of 2(two) advocates being reflected in the Cause-list, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Situated thus, the matter stands dismissed for non- prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant