CR No. 6350 of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (121) CR No. 6350 of 2025 Date of Decision : 11.09.2025 Jagjot Singh ...Petitioner Versus Satwinder Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral) 1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana in case titled “Satwinder Singh Vs. Jagjot Singh (CS No. 938 of 2024) to decide the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 (d) read with Section 3, 4 & 17 of Limitation Act dated 04.09.2025 (Annexure P-5) which is fixed for 12.09.2025, at the first instance before deciding stay application. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only to seek a direction to the Trial Court for deciding the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 (d) read with Section 3, 4 & 17 of Limitation Act. 3. Heard. 4. Considering the limited nature of the relief sought by the petitioner, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with, as the same is likely to further delay the proceedings. KANCHAN 2025.09.12 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CR No. 6350 of 2025 2 5. In view of the averments made in the petition, the present revision petition stands disposed of, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana is directed to decide the application dated 04.09.2025 filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) read with Section 3, 4 & 17 of Limitation Act, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. September 11, 2025 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2025.09.12 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment