Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10008 (CHH)

GYAN RUCHANDANI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1362/2021 · 2025-07-17

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1362 of 2021 1 - Gyan Ruchandani S/o Awat Ram Ruchandani, Aged About 58 Years R/o Ward No. 26 (Old 25), Santrabadi, Durg (Chhattisgarh), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Municipal Corporation, Durg (Chhattisgarh) Through Municipal Commissioner, Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Assistant Engineer And Encroachment Incharge, Public Works Department, Municipal Corporation, Durg (Chhattisgarh), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shri Atma Ram Rahangdale Sub Engineer, Public Works, Municipal Corporation, Durg (Chhattisgarh), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shri Jagdish Kesharwani Sub Engineer, Public Works, Municipal Corporation, Durg (Chhattisgarh), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr. Lav Sharma, P.L. For Respondents No. 2 to 5 : Ms. Mamta Patel, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.07.18 17:30:48 +0530 2 18-07-2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed directing respondent authorities to provide sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner if they conduct demarcation which may affect the land belonging to petitioner in near future. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Accordingly, this petition is hereby being disposed of directing respondent authorities to provide sufficient opportunity of hearing to petitioner, in case they conduct demarcation affecting the land belonging to him in near future. 4) With the aforesaid direction(s), this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya